In retrospect, should the democrats gone ahead at let the Republicans remove the ability to filibuster from the Senate back with all that bru-ha-ha in 2005?
It's funny how it never occured to retards like Bill Frist that the rule change could someday be used against the GOP, isn't it? But you have to remember, I suppose, that the rule change was being discussed back in the "permanent republican majority" days.
Fortunately there were a few Republicans who realized that they might not be in power forever. Yes, had the rules been amended the GOP would be looking at a first-class reaming in a few weeks. I suppose the Democrats could change the rule, although I think that would inspire a lot of backlash.
Mike says:
In retrospect, should the democrats gone ahead at let the Republicans remove the ability to filibuster from the Senate back with all that bru-ha-ha in 2005?
Ed says:
It's funny how it never occured to retards like Bill Frist that the rule change could someday be used against the GOP, isn't it? But you have to remember, I suppose, that the rule change was being discussed back in the "permanent republican majority" days.
Fortunately there were a few Republicans who realized that they might not be in power forever. Yes, had the rules been amended the GOP would be looking at a first-class reaming in a few weeks. I suppose the Democrats could change the rule, although I think that would inspire a lot of backlash.