I have no idea what everyone is talking about with "Sky Captain and the City of Tomorrow." Critics appear to be loving the movie as it is an almost totally digital experience that isn't a complete failure (a la the recent rash of Star Wars prequels and the two Matrix sequels). I'm not cynical enough where I can associate "not a failure" with "good" – even for Hollywood summer releases.
This movie invokes a world of sci-fi serials and images of what people in the 1930s would have thought the future to look like, but it falls flat after that.
I wasn't looking for much, but the two basic rules of making an American adventure popcorn movie is (a) make the lead likable and (b) bring the audience into all the excitement. Jude Law is given a lot of time to look pretty, but doesn't have any sense of anything other than male model about him. Any excitement to be had is sucked away by the digital effects – but not for the reason that most of these movies fail with too many special effects.
The coloring of the film is where effects work has been done.
online pharmacy vibramycin best drugstore for you
Everything has a deep saturation to it; newsrooms are all in brown, skylines blue, etc.
online pharmacy elavil best drugstore for you
The lighting is done in a way that it looks good – technically that's a feat. The highlights don't bleed into the whites, the characters all look sharp, and everything has it's proper hue. I guess some critics were drawn in by this look of vintage sci-fi magazines aged to odd colors in old bookstores – I had the opposite reaction.
All the odd coloring kept me at a distance. With everyone visually at odds to me, I couldn't really feel one thing or the other for anybody. This is fine for the first act or so, but at some point they should have dropped the heavy effects and let the audience actually enjoy the story and characters. The story being kinda dumb doesn't help. Not even Angelina Jolie, in an outfit suitable for female comic book characters and/or sex industry workers, could make this movie interesting.
Skip it.
Ed says:
I was really floored to see all the reviews – even from bitchy things like chud.com – fawn over this movie. Aside from having the worst title since "The Hudsucker Proxy" (I suppose "Billy and the Clone-a-saurus" was taken) it looked to me, from the trailers, like the absolute worst movie made this year that was not named "Soul Plane". It looks like the kind of movie that they play in the middle of the night on USA and f/x. Between this and Van Helsing, the video game/movie line is getting dangerously blurry.
Liz says:
I've seen six billion previews, and I still don't believe in this movie. I haven't spoken to anyone who's seen it and it looks like something parents make up to scare their children. I also can't help but notice that the pile of skin I ripped from the raw chicken I was attempting to butcher last night and this movie have never been seen in the same room together. Coincidence?
wombat says:
yea i didn't see the movie but it looked worse than House Of The Dead. *ewwwww* (games should not be made into movies except for a few choice cases.)